Return to site

Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

 If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone. These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create issues for users. It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts. Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is. While it sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were far from antennas. But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues. This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. https://note1s.com/notes/Z6TJP8 is important to understand because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, safe distance from cell tower is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues). This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore what is a safe distance from a cell tower shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines. Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

https://note1s.com/notes/Z6TJP8|safe distance from cell tower|what is a safe distance from a cell tower