If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone. These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby. It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health. https://anotepad.com/notes/5bmbkrfq (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue. However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer. Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower. While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas. But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues. This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs. https://postheaven.net/tauruscomb84/very-best-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-system for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue). This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines. Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for https://rentry.co/p8yma with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
https://anotepad.com/notes/5bmbkrfq|https://postheaven.net/tauruscomb84/very-best-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-system|https://rentry.co/p8yma
