If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone. They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health. what is a safe distance from a cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue. However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts. Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower. While follow this link sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas. But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues. This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating). This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards. Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower|what is a safe distance from a cell tower|follow this link
